Platform
Spend management on top of fully classified AP: executive views, monthly operating rhythm, and (below) an example of how category spend can be tracked through a transition—on the same platform spine.
Talk to Us →Executive intelligence
Enterprise snapshot from classified AP
Normalized vendors, addressable vs non-addressable spend, visibility and PO signals, shadow IT, and the vendor universe—pulled from the same invoice spine the platform runs every month.
Executive Spend Intelligence
Enterprise-wide AP classified, enriched, and reframed for procurement action.
After the award
Category RFP: who is still billing, who absorbed the scope, are we under target?
Procurement teams need to see every vendor still in the category, not just the winner. The stacked view shows incumbents ramping off, the consolidated supplier ramping up, and total category spend against baseline and the savings line — tied to the same transition milestones you'd enter from the RFP (award, cutover, run-rate).
Example: category RFP — consolidated scope
Stacked vendor spend through transition vs category target
Stacked bands: two incumbents wind down to zero; the winning vendor expands as they take the consolidated scope. Navy line = total category spend. Shaded bands map to RFP award + cutover dates you load from the deal (same inputs as the live command center).
Typical inputs: award month · incumbent decommission milestones · winner SOW go-live · category baseline run-rate · committed savings %
Illustrative timeline and spend — live views use your AP actuals and deal dates.
Initiatives in the workbooks
Track programs the way they show up in spend
Example layout: initiatives with scope, baselines, and how progress appears in AP—so procurement can tie narrative to invoice reality in the same command center.
Rate reduction on cloud computing through committed use discounts and FinOps optimization. CloudScale Technologies ($135.9M) is the primary target; DataVault Inc and Zenith Platform included.
Governance initiative to increase PO coverage in Finance from 8.1% to 50% by Q3 2026. No direct dollar savings — delivers risk reduction, audit readiness, and spend visibility.
Single-vendor dependency with no competitive alternative on a $19.3M contract. A market test or rebid creates leverage for rate improvement.
Six vendors across device manufacturing, leasing, IT asset management, and logistics. Multiple single-source dependencies present consolidation opportunity.
Every month
Scorecard + initiative status — same IDs, actual vs target
The monthly report picks up the same initiative IDs and rolls up pipeline, PO compliance, and vendor movement in one operating rhythm.
December 2025 Scorecard
December spend of $117.2M is significantly above November, driven by HR year-end tax withholdings and bonus processing (+$17.8M), seasonal hardware installs (+$8.6M), and Pinnacle Consulting Group advisory fees (+$5.3M). Enterprise PO compliance improved modestly to 48.8%, though the Finance organization remains critically below target at 7.0%. 114 new vendors appeared requiring compliance review. No initiative savings realized — all six remain in baseline or pre-contract phases. INI-006 (Shadow IT) is the only initiative with an IN PROGRESS status; INI-002 (PO Compliance) is flagged BEHIND.
MaxxBot
Natural-language procurement interface
Query your Maxx-classified spend and tap broader procurement intelligence—vendor lookup, benchmarking, contract and RFP guidance, and day-to-day operating questions.
Try MaxxBot →
