PROMPT A - CHALLENGE ENGAGEMENT BOUNDARIES
Review every provisional engagement split. Identify suppliers that may contain multiple services, organizations, geographies, pricing models, owners, or risk profiles. Show evidence for each recommended split or merge. Do not change the register until a human approves.

PROMPT B - CONTRACT CONFLICT REVIEW
List every field where the master agreement, statement of work, amendment, invoice, service report, or operating plan conflicts. Cite both sources. Recommend which role should decide which source is authoritative.

PROMPT C - BASELINE AND EVIDENCE REVIEW
For each engagement, determine whether the baseline is reproducible from an authoritative source. Separate stated baselines, calculated baselines, inferred baselines, and missing baselines. Never book or estimate savings from a missing baseline.

PROMPT D - OWNERSHIP AND GOVERNANCE REVIEW
Identify engagements without one named buyer owner and one named provider owner. Show review cadence, escalation thresholds, and decision rights where documented. Route missing ownership to human resolution.

PROMPT E - EXIT AND CONTINUITY REVIEW
Identify engagements with unclear data-return rights, knowledge-transfer obligations, transition assistance, credential-transfer process, open-work handoff, or termination timing. Do not provide legal conclusions. Prepare questions for legal, security, procurement, and business owners.

PROMPT F - FINAL HUMAN-REVIEW PACKET
Create a compact review packet listing only: high-impact confirmed facts, conflicts, missing controls, assumptions, decisions required, and proposed record corrections. Include citations for every item.